The Road
The Road
Regie:
John HillcoatDrehbuch:
Joe PenhallKamera:
Javier AguirresarobeBesetzung:
Viggo Mortensen, Kodi Smit-McPhee, Charlize Theron, Robert Duvall, Guy Pearce, Garret Dillahunt, Michael Kenneth Williams, Molly Parker, Paul Hodge (mehr)Inhalte(1)
Von der Welt, wie wir sie kennen, ist nichts als ein von Asche bedecktes Ödland übriggeblieben, auf dem sich die Überlebenden voller Furcht und Misstrauen begegnen. Der Nächste ist hier tatsächlich des nächsten Wolf und jegliche Hoffnung ist einer dumpfen Angst gewichen. Dies ist die Welt, die ein Vater (Viggo Mortensen) und sein Sohn in The Road bereisen. Sie durchqueren mit einem Einkaufswagen, gefüllt mit ihrem letzten Hab und Gut, die Trümmer und Ruinen, möglichst bemüht keinem Menschen zu begegnen. Die Ehefrau des Vaters (Charlize Theron) hat den Wahnsinn der Welt nicht mehr ertragen können und hatte die beiden im Dunkel der Nacht verlassen. Was ihnen bleibt ist die Hoffnung an die Küste zu gelangen, wo vielleicht irgendetwas anders ist. Der Vater wird seinen Sohn vor allen Gefahren schützen (u.a. marodierende Kannibalen), auch wenn das in letzter Konsequenz bedeutet, ihn zu töten. (Verleiher-Text)
(mehr)Kritiken (9)
Ein trauriger und schöner Film. Eine langsam und sensibel erzählte Geschichte vom Weg von zwei wehrlosen Personen in einer Welt ohne Menschlichkeit. In einer Welt, in der ich sie nicht allein lassen wollte und sie beschützen wollte. Der ausgezeichnete Mortensen, der phänomenale Duvall, eine höllisch düstere Szene und ein schönes, allgegenwärtiges Klaviermotiv. Der bisher zweite Zuwachs (nach Shutter Island) in meiner diesjährigen Top-10-Liste.
()
For most of the runtime I had decided on a 100% rating, but the last few minutes belong to a completely different film. When it comes to the portrayal of a post-apocalyptic future, The Road leaves all the modern competition way behind. Only the old British film Threads can be compared in terms of the intensity of the despair and depression. The Road is a strong argument for those who claim that I Am Legend and Carriers are not particularly good films. 9/10
()
Hillcoat certainly didn't do badly here and in fact, I can't imagine if McCarthy’s book could have been adapted more faithfully. However, like the Coen brothers, the film is brought down by the poor rewrite that simplified some passages for the film medium, and cut others, and yet added nothing of its own. I appreciate the austere work with images, which doesn't push the viewer into the popular post-apocalyptic depression, but rather strums on grimly sad strings, like the musician Nick Cave. Regardless, I’m glad Hillcoat had the balls to film it the way he did. On the other hand, the aftertaste of uselessness cannot be repelled, at least in my case. Seven thumbs up out of ten. I think I'll go to the movies. I’m afraid of Blood Meridian.
()
Eine im Rahmen des Möglichen sensible und angemessene Adaption von Cormac McCarthys Kurzgeschichte. Faktum ist, dass das, was sich in der Vorlage irgendwo auf die schwer fassbaren Höhen von "Göttlichkeit", "Mitgefühl" und "Menschlichkeit" bezog, im Film logischerweise am Schlamm und Staub im Film haften bleibt. Doch meiner Meinung hätte man das ganze gar nicht viel besser und rauer drehen können - lediglich ein größerer Zusammenhalt würde dem zweifellos nicht schaden.
()
The most catastrophic commercial for Coca-Cola. McCarthy’s The Road stands on atmosphere, and so it was extremely important that no one scene should stick out, like in the book, so that a month later you have no memory of anything specific that happened, only of the atmosphere of cruel despair, ruin; a world where trusting your nearest and dearest is a synonym for criminal naivety. A memory of the atmosphere that gets under your skin, an atmosphere that will stay with you long after you leave the movie theatre. All it takes is somebody coughing on the bus, the sight of a discarded beer can and there you are again - up to your ears in depression. I don’t want to pretend that this is flawless. It isn’t. I could find quite a lot of things to criticize here, but everything fades in the shade of THAT atmosphere and the very end, where you find out straight away who has what perspective of the world (you know: is the glass half-full or half empty?). That dulls the edges of any of its negative aspects. Mainly that it’s fragmentary and everything else that the book suffers from. Yes, you heard me right, although I really like The Road, I don’t rate it among McCarthy’s top works. It isn’t even his most atmospheric works. P.S.: But this is one of those pointless adaptations. It’s an illustration, one to one scale, nothing more. I really had expected the director to cut deeper and defy the “canon" of the book, while still remaining faithful to it. Here, everything is down to the book, and nothing comes “out of Hillcoat". That’s why I give it four.
()
To be honest, The Road rather disappointed me. It lacks spark, and the label "intimate" here only masks the directorial helplessness. Some films take place in much smaller spaces, like caves or coffins, and yet manage to keep the viewer in constant tension. The Road depicts a post-apocalyptic world where every day is a struggle for survival, but it fails to sell it properly. It has the energy of a person after a marathon. The post-apocalyptic genre often falls into stupid action B-movies like Mad Max. The Road had a unique opportunity to show the realistic demise of proud human civilization in all its hopelessness and horror. However, it lacks atmosphere and often even tension. The engagement of a world-class star like Charlize Theron seems utterly unnecessary for a few insignificant flashbacks; any unknown television actress could have easily handled it. The dialogues are too brief and clearly did not receive much attention. The Road shows a world after an unspecified disaster (most likely the fall of a larger celestial body), but this image has weaknesses. If it had crashed into the sea, it would have caused a gigantic tsunami that would have washed away hundreds of millions of people from coastal areas and plains, and extensive salinization would have led to local famines. It would have been a blow to human civilization, but certainly not a mortal one. If it had crashed on land, it would have thrown such a large amount of rock and dust into the atmosphere that it would have probably caused climate change for a few hundred years. It is said that civilization ends three days after supply collapses, but the image of aimlessly wandering individuals, couples, and small groups in a dead landscape would likely look completely different. From one day to another, the fine liberal civilization with culture, human rights, and consumer gluttony would come to an end. Relentless competition for dwindling supplies and resources would begin, but it would likely be organized and highly sophisticated. Rather than cannibalism, the use of weapons of mass destruction and large-scale wars waged this time without regard for public opinion and to the extreme would be the real threat. Unlike most movie makers, I don't think ammunition would be scarce. If humanity has an abundance of anything, it's weapons in general. This would be a large-scale operation. Today's states would quickly collapse, taking their helpless political representation with them, and those with firm determination would come to power. In the film, the question of whether certain people are good or not is asked several times. Similar terms would lose their meaning in a post-apocalyptic society (at least the meaning they have today). The task of the time would be to reduce the Earth's current population of 8 billion to a few million who are capable of sustaining themselves in the post-apocalyptic world. People who survived would face something worse than hunger and cold. They would lose compassion and humanity. Even if the Earth were hit by a planet that once wiped out the dinosaurs, nature and humans have an extraordinary ability to adapt. Considering the topic and knowing that Hillcoat did not want to make a cheap action flick, I give it a weak 3 stars. Overall impression: 50%.
()
(weniger)
(mehr)
A post apocalyptic movie of the highest quality drenched in the murkiest atmosphere and wrapped in the darkness of grey fumes evaporating from a dying planet. We don’t know why exactly, but that doesn’t matter. What matters is survival. To eat and not get eaten. Viggo Mortensen is at his best and his little side-kick Kodi Smith-McPhee plays a great supporting role. These two under the firm direction of John Hillcoat push the dolly forward at a slow and contemplative tempo towards an ending which is not exactly impressive, but fairly logical. And that’s about it.
()
Uncompromising with every step, a film that doesn't hold back and can be quite a solid punch for the viewer. Mortensen is very believable and the production design is excellent. A bit slow-paced and, for my taste, lacking in plot twists, but still satisfying. Some scenes are very chilling.
()
I wasn’t disappointed. The film moves slowly, but keeps a magic and unique atmosphere. The beautiful camera work deserves praise, it captures that desolate and dark environment without a single glimpse of greenery and without any sign of life – I think the poster alone says a lot. Will, hope and love, that's what this unconventional adventure is all about.
()