Schindlers Liste

Was soll man über diesen Film schreiben, wenn man nicht nur wieder alle Superlative erwähnen möchte, die man jedem Filmaspekt zuordnet? Welles hat Citizen Kane, Coppola Der Pate, Kubrick 2001: Odyssee im Weltraum und Spielberg Schindlers Liste. Amon Göth von Ralph Fiennes ist eine Personifikation des Verfalls des menschlichen Geistes, der für die größte Tragödie unserer Geschichte verantwortlich ist. Der Soundtrack von John Williams ist der Höhepunkt der zeitgenössischen Filmmusik, der Kameramann Janusz Kamiński ist für mich – einen Liebhaber der Schwarz-Weiß-Komposition – ein Abgott. Und die Räumung des Krakauer Ghettos gehört zu den schlimmsten Filmszenen, die ich je gesehen habe. Steven Spielberg hat mit diesem Film die Aufgabe erfüllt, wegen der er Regisseur wurde. Und ich würde am liebsten jede Aufnahme aus diesem Film einrahmen lassen und mir wünschen, dass ich die Zeit zurückdrehen und diese Ereignisse verhindern kann. (27.05.2002)

Jemand hat einmal Schindlers Liste als den Baustein der Holocaust-Filmgeschichte bezeichnet. Und natürlich bestätigt dies sein Einfluss. Natürlich ist Nicky’s Family nicht das einzige Projekt, das sich praktisch buchstäblich inspiriert hat, Steven Spielberg hat sich einfach dafür entschieden, eine für Akademiker und normale Menschen gleichermaßen universelle Sprache zu sprechen. (15.10.2022)

Spielberg's sensitive precision, Williams's music, Kaminsky's cinematography, Neeson's eyes, Fiennes's villain, Kingsley's everything, the little girl in the red dress walking through the black and white film... An unforgettable story. PS: Finally seen in the cinema on the occasion of the 25th anniversary. Indescribable experience. (15.01.2008)

I consider Steven Spielberg to be one of the best storytellers in the world of film, regardless of how many stars I give to Schindler's List. He is an excellent craftsman and storyteller. Some voices in the community of film fans sometimes argue that he is too commercial and that they only take Schindler's List or Saving Private Ryan seriously from his work. I have the exact opposite feeling. Spielberg has always told fairy tales, whether for children or adults, and they are perfectly suited for relaxation and genre projects. Sci-fi, adventure stories, or fantasy from his workshop are usually treats. It's worse when he tries to enter the realm of high art and wants to do timeless, more serious work. Spielberg still uses similar or identical means as in his relaxation projects. In Schindler's List, several quite serious things bother me. First, the whole story is based on an artificially created myth, and even though its core is true, it ultimately sounds like Radio Yerevan reports. The facts are upside down here. Oskar Schindler was an adventurer, a Nazi not out of conviction but based on hard calculation, a manipulator, and a ruthless exploiter. Much negative can be said about him, and it would be much more accurate to despise and condemn him rather than admire him. Historical films usually approach the interpretation of historical facts languidly and only take from them what they need to achieve their goal or a partial effect. And usually, if it concerns distant history, viewers don't mind – except for historians and fans of historical science. But here it is so striking and concerns such a sensitive topic that it fundamentally bothers me. Schindler's real role has already been mapped by historians and completely contradicts everything Spielberg portrays in his film. In the labor camp, prisoners were mainly selected from the ranks of the Jewish police, collaborators, or those who had to pay. The conditions in the camp were very harsh, and its only advantage was that it was not systematically exterminationist, meaning that there were no gas chambers. Schindler was completely indifferent to the prisoners, and all he cared about was how to monetize their slave labor. By the way, neither Oskar Schindler nor anyone else saved any human lives. For those who were taken to the Protectorate, other prisoners had to be selected for liquidation… Another problem is Spielberg's typical squeezing of emotions, where possible, emotional manipulation, moving, blackmailing, and behaving like a typical blockbuster producer. Despite all this, he managed to convey the horrors of the Holocaust to the widest audience at a time when many decades had passed since the events and eyewitnesses were dying out, which is not insignificant. At the very least, the scene of the ghetto liquidation belongs among the memorable film moments. Overall impression: 60%. (18.01.2014)

When Spielberg puts forward his most fundamental mental dilemma alongside opinions and beliefs, nothing can arise but the strongest and extra tasty cinematic coffee and his intellectual peak. While Schindler's transformation from an ordinary citizen to an unstoppable advocate for all neighbors gains intensity perhaps a bit inconspicuously, during grand scenes and perfectly credible streams of thoughts from the mouths of the main characters, it becomes all the more emphatic. A truly unique and irreplicable work in its own way, in every aspect. (31.12.2005)