Narcos

Eine Serie spanischer Herkunft einer Südamerikanischer Produktion in der es an echten Stars fehlt... Es ist gar nicht so lange her, wo man so eine Vorstellung auslachen würde. Zum Glück gibt es Wunder im TV und die Serie Narcos ist eines davon. Die Grenze zwischen Film und Serie wurde nun auch südlich von Hollywood überschritten. Man nehme die beste Krimiserie der letzten Jahre als Beispiel und stärkt sie damit, dass es sich diesmal um keine Fiktion handelt, sondern um eine gnadenlose kolumbianische Geschichte. Außerdem sehr sachlich dargestellt. Man wird wirklich nicht die Verherrlichung der Amerikaner oder Kolumbianer sehen, die es hier auf die Drogenbarone abgesehen haben. José Padilha et. haben einfach Escobars Lebensweg so dargestellt, dass selbst DER Kenner der Höhen und Tiefen großer Männer stolz auf sie sein würde - Martin Scorsese. (28.09.2015)

The first episode has immediately sucked me in with how informative and documentary-like Pablo Escobar’s story felt. The documentary style of editing gets slower and slower with following episodes, but I didn’t even mind. You’ll be watching every minute and wait for the writers to hit you with another fun fact that will once again assure you that you aren’t watching fiction. Quite the contrary, you’re watching an incredibly cruel reality of Columbia at the time. At times, it’s even hard to believe that all of this could happen. However, exactly this incredulity is the core of the premise that is so strong that not even 5 stars feel enough. It was an absolute blast. Netflix really outdid themselves. (15.05.2018)

I guess, you will not find out what the problem (or more precisely the unpleasant snag) of this series is… It has two central lines. Drug dealers "South American" Spanish-speaking lines that is focused on the late career of the patron of the Medellin cartel Pablo Escobar (fantastic, respectful and, Mour that does not overplay at all), which is full of intrigue, tension, well built and adhering to genre specifics, without however, deviating significantly from reality (after all, there is no reason for that, because even the reality was sometimes hard to believe). The second DEA "North American" English-speaking story line is way too much procedural, addressing the details of the investigation (both agents were actively involved in the development of the series) and the hunt for the drug lord, who was one of the richest/most dangerous people of his time. You already know what the snag is, right? Yes, each story line is completely (but really completely) different. It cannot be said that one is better or worse than the other one, because their style, atmosphere and concept are so different that they are simply incompatible in many respects. In addition, there is a third component in the form of very frequent documentary sequences that are like a radio broadcast and are accompanied by archival then footage. Although each of the components works great independently and there is nothing to complain about (perhaps it just looks like each agency is represented only by one person), they do not fit together and do not form a coherent whole. Which, given their qualities, is rather a letdown. And it is even a bigger letdown since it has already been shown that these seemingly incompatible approaches to this topic can still be successfully combined (I mean Don Winslow). In other words, it is a disappointment, but it is certainly not something that would change the indisputable fact that Narcos has become one of the top shows in contemporary quality TV. (28.08.2015)

An amazingly gripping introduction. Pablo’s rise is compelling and Miami in the 80s always brings back memories of Scarface and the days I used to cruise around Vice City. The semi-documentary style and the narrator’s idiosyncratic style perfectly illustrate the atmosphere of success and horrific destruction that the white snow brought to Florida with it, but the money... Season 2: the first half is unbelievably high-speed. Carillo’s return and farewell are some of the high points of the series. Moura is excellent the whole time. Even though the second half (of the second half) is slower overall, it’s that much more methodical... conspiratorial. Introspective. Hard to say if it was a good idea to prolong the series with two more seasons. Of course, it has potential, but I hope that it won’t be a mere dilution and that the creators will continue to keep their feet firmly on the ground. Coma Mierda. (05.10.2015)

In the field of organized crime, there were many important players, but only one was the king. A man who declared war on his own country, but also the only private individual who ever challenged the United States of America to a duel. A man who, at the height of his fame, earned 5 billion dollars a year, and owned a private army including an air force and navy. A man who created a state within a state and paid a significant portion of state institutions. Pablo Escobar became a legend even during his lifetime. I remember that even behind the Iron Curtain in the 80s, fragmentary information about his exploits reached us. And although we lived with different problems on a different continent, Escobar was simply an unmistakable figure on a global scale. The most significant drug producer and dealer, a man who aspired to become the Colombian president, a megalomaniac, and a completely ruthless brutal murderer. Narcos is an exceptionally interesting work primarily because of the material it deals with. The life stories of Pablo Escobar and other members of the Medellín Cartel would be enough for several seasons of a TV series, and there would still be plenty to tell. This is actually the biggest problem with the series. It is too concise, and the majority of the characters remain at the level of figures. For me, the best series about organized crime remains Boardwalk Empire (although I haven't seen The Wire yet). Wagner Moura enjoys playing the role of Pablo Escobar, and José Padilha's direction is reliable and he feels right at home in the genre. The series has a significance for Latin America that we fully cannot realize in Europe. Pablo Escobar was loved and admired by the masses regardless of the number of dead bodies he left behind. He simply had the reputation of a man of the people and a bandit who distributed his wealth to the poor. The series ruthlessly breaks this perception and portrays Pablo Escobar as a destroyer of his country and society, which he systematically undermined with his activities. It is quite telling that his attacks, which targeted the general public, remained without a response, and the reaction of the political elite only came when he attacked high society. The poorer classes suffered the most from his terror. At the same time, the series also shows that Escobar was able to build his empire at a time when the United States was preoccupied with the Cold War. Once the rivalry with the Soviet Union ceased, the cartel began to decline rapidly, because the potential that was previously tied to the fight against communism could now be directed elsewhere. Overall impression: 90%. (13.12.2015)