Interview mit einem Vampir

Ein Film, der mich geprägt hat wie kein anderer. Es wäre müßig, alle Wiederholungen zu zählen, die ich gesehen habe, alle Formate, in denen ich IWTV gesehen habe, und zu berechnen, wie tief die Adaption meine Liebe zu Anne Rice in mir verwurzelt hat. Auch nach zwanzig Jahren ist der Film nicht gealtert, jedes kleine Detail ist immer noch faszinierend, der Soundtrack kommt aus einer anderen Welt, und Lestat und seine Geschichte begeistern immer wieder aufs Neue. Kirsten Dunst ist zu einer Legende geworden und Antonio Banderas hat seine Pariser Zeit in den Theatres des Vampires nie vergessen... Die neue Serie Interview with the Vampire (2022) ist ebenfalls großartig. (03.02.2009)

Ein bemerkenswertes Vampir-Epos, das definitiv nicht in die Kategorie Vampir-Horrorfilm fällt, sondern mit überraschender Eleganz an der Grenze zwischen Drama und einer eher kontroversen Liebesgeschichte balanciert. Die Quintessenz dieses Spektakels sind die überzeugenden Auftritte des Duos Cruise und Pitt, deren homosexuelle Beziehung sich durch den gesamten Film zieht. Und schließlich spielen viel mehr als die Vampirrequisiten die Beziehungen zwischen den Figuren und eine Art "realistischer" Blick in die Unterwelt der Vampire in Interview mit einem Vampir eine Rolle. Auf jeden Fall ein interessanter Film, dem vielleicht nur eine starke Steigerung und eine etwas besser konstruierte Geschichte fehlen. Aber dafür gibt es Atmosphäre und einige wirklich großartige und kraftvolle Szenen, die im Gedächtnis haften bleiben. (22.08.2004)

When I saw Interview with the Vampire a few years ago, I had mixed feelings about it, so I decided to revisit it and I had to lower my rating mercilessly because it served as a prelude to what Twilight would later become much more decisively. Vampire stories have their foundation in gothic novels and especially in romanticism, so those romantic motifs of torn souls and passions somehow belong there, but the story took a path of diminished romanticism, and listening to the pathetic dialogue is quite a suffering in some places. The philosophical plane about the immortal being struggling with the passage of time and its immutability is plainly superficial, even though it receives quite a bit of attention. Neil Jordan has an interesting experimental horror film with a special artistic poetics called The Company of Wolves, but here he fully subordinates his talent to the interests of the studio, and it's noticeable. The result is such an ambitious and grandiose adaptation that mainly sells itself by having Tom Cruise, Brad Pitt, and the youthful charm of future star Kirsten Dunst. There is nothing scary in it, though there is some tension, but the budget is quite noticeable in the production design. Overall impression: 45%. (14.02.2012)

A very well-made picture, brought down mainly by the actors. Not that their acting is bad, quite the opposite, most of the performances are above their usual standard, but the casting could certainly have been better. Mainly Lestat (but I have almost nothing against Cruise) completely lacks the aura of charisma that the book gives him. The only one who manages to get under your skin with her acting is “young" Claudia, played by the splendid Kirsten Dunst. The adaptation went well, but all that remains are nice illustrations of the book, because they left out its philosophical level. Absolutely completely. Which, considering the whole story, atmosphere and message is founded on it, is rather a serious shortcoming. (19.10.2006)

A stellar, long haired duo in the lead roles of a vampire movie that’s entertaining at last. A convincing atmosphere and the passing of the ages is almost tangible (Superman roolzz). Even so, IWTV is a bit too slow for my taste, and at two o’clock at the morning my eyelids had were heavier than was practical. After all, I am not a vampire. At least I think not... (16.08.2010)