Hodejegerne

It’s been long since two dead fat people were so funny… A perfect Nordic thriller, and, against expectations, it’s not serious or depressing, but a brisk and entertaining film that knows how to make you feel tension, surprise and fun. PS: Plus points for giving a certain animal species the end it deserved (#cantavoidphobia). (10.11.2011)

Genre-Perversion auf die norwegische Art. Ein Heist, ein Drama über einen Mann, bei dem es Minderwertigkeitskomplexe, Exploatation sowie Thrillercharakter zu sehen gibt ... Tyldum hat sich mit dieser Verbindung nicht so richtig zu helfen gewusst, manchmal ist seine Herangehensweise gar unangenehm fernsehartig und steril, jedoch einige Passagen wirken nahezu göttlich (insbesondere der Abschnitt mit Fekalien und einem Traktor). Nesbo ist sicherlich ein gewandter Autor - die Geschichte sieht zwar mit Absicht langweilig aus, nur um am Ende (im Rahmen der Genregrenzen) mit soliden Wendungen zu überraschen. Diesem Film würden wohl mehr Einsicht und bessere Dialogen gut tun. Denn das Vergnügen, welches er bereitet, watet entlang des Grates guilty pleasure. Aksel Hennie in der Titelrolle ist etwas zwischen Christopher Walken und Steve Buscemi ... seine konzentrierte und glaubhafte Wandlung von einem komplexen Zwerg in einen Mann am Rande der Erschöpfung zwingt mich, dieser uferlosen und regietechnisch seltsamen Verrücktheit 4 * zu geben. (26.10.2011)

Whatever you're expecting… It won’t happen. A genre chameleon about a stunted Walken which proves that Joe Nesbø works well on the film screen despite the plotholes (the age of the corpse one can forgive with half-closed eyes, let's say, but the hospital staff or the one who finds Roger - is it possible that no one would get in touch or ask them after the case was publicized?). (12.02.2012)

Aksel Hennie was born for the role of the slippery Roger and the polished charisma of Nikolaj Coster-Waldau suits the film, but unfortunately, the originality was somewhere else. For every well-constructed idea or bizarre joke, there is also one wasted. I enjoy both the dramatic introduction and the chilling development of the thriller, but in the end, due to some minor simplifications, there is a lack of more satisfying twists. The Jo Nesbø source material has more lightness in it. (12.12.2015)

I finally understand why Jo Nesbo is considered a master in the field of crime literature. Based on such great source material, the screenplay is well-written and the film is well-directed. However, it must be noted that neither the screenwriters nor the director made any serious mistakes. For about three-quarters of the way, I was convinced that I was watching a 100% five-star film. Typical Scandinavian madness, pitch-black humor, crazy situations, absurdity - even if I didn't know the country of origin, I would immediately guess it's from one of the Nordic countries. But then comes the last quarter, delimited by Roger's encounter with his wife, playing on strong emotions, and the previous atmosphere starts to crumble a bit. When the finale arrived, I thought to myself that the screenwriter had indeed made two logical somersaults. Although the first one was saved by the final credits, the second one - how can a man in the main character's situation believe a woman and bet everything on one card? That really doesn't make sense to me. Nevertheless, Headhunters cannot be denied its originality, pervasive tension, captivating characters, and impressive ending. Despite some minor reservations, I lean toward a 5-star rating. There aren't many films like this, where it is a joy to follow the development of the plot and not be deceived by screenwriting shortcomings. Overall impression: 90%. Although I'm not a moralist, I definitely wouldn't let a 12-year-old child watch this film. After all, it is a quite bloody mess, not commonly seen in today's cinema. (18.08.2013)

A great crime drama with an unmistakable Nordic signature. The cruel black humour alternates with suspenseful action and the great twists and turns will keep you on your toes. Nesbo can be satisfied. (29.04.2018)

I admit that my concentration was not at the level that such a renowned Nordic film deserved (when I get a text message from my dream girl, perhaps only Stanley Kubrick has better chances...), but I can defend my three stars. I didn't like the way the story was conceived and constructed, how the director forced me to explore and enjoy the mostly physical suffering of the main character, for whom he could generate almost no sympathy at the beginning. Moreover, the plot scheme seems unnecessarily complex, contrasting sharply with the straightforward, atmospheric and suggestively violent second half, which, on the other hand, is exactly what I was looking forward to and what even Americans are not so skilled at – an entertaining, formally chilling and at times almost black-humoured whirlwind of playful and, above all, functional script tricks and naturalistic imagery, whose only weakness remains its sheer coldness and emotional detachment. It's like watching a beautiful football match, filled with goals and great action in the second half, but between Tanzania and Zimbabwe – I'll be satisfied, but I won't care how it ends :-D 65% (15.10.2015)

The sick work of a manic-depressive director who can't tell the difference between his grandmother's death and a really good joke. A film in which neither good nor evil, love nor forgiveness wins, but the more systematic manipulative bastard wins. Norwegians are dangerous. I want more. (28.10.2011)

I enjoyed this film. It's a crime thriller with a touch of drama and pitch-black comedy, and there's even a romantic element. I’m a fan of Jo Nesbo, especially the series featuring Harry Hole. Having read “Headhunters,” I’m surprised to say I liked the film more than the book. The main "hero" was extremely unlikable from the start, my sympathy grew as he was faced with more and more shit (literally). Nikolaj Coster-Waldau knows how to portray a bad guy. He has done it many times before and pulled it off again. This is the third time I’ve seen the film. I knew how the story would develop and how it would end, and I still loved every minute of it. Plus, I have to appreciate the lesson to be taken away from this film: when traveling on public transport, always sit between two obese passengers – it’s definitely worth the temporary discomfort. (19.12.2016)

The difference between what I expected and what I got is too huge. Headhunters is a sort of brutal Nordic pulp, properly cold, chilling, and balanced with a reasonable amount of irony and detachment. The chilling moments don't quite measure up to the best of Fincher, the screenwriting twist where "it all goes pear-shaped" is a worthy match for the Coens, and the proper butchery makes one think of earlier equally proper old-school American pieces. With all the charming melancholy of Scandinavia and a not entirely predictable conclusion, Headhunters can comfortably endeavor for foreign film status for 2011. I would sincerely wish them that, although I "honestly" doubt they’ll even get a nomination. I'd love to be wrong, because the inventiveness in this is truly immense. (09.01.2012)