30 Days of Night

Der angesehene britische Theatergentleman Danny Huston in der Rolle eines Vampir-Leaders in einem gewöhnlich geschriebenen Horrorfilm? Sam Raimi ist ein starker und erfinderischer Produzent. Schon nach den ersten Aufnahmen am Anfang ist klar, dass es kein B-Movie sein wird. David Slade kann Zack Snyder die Hand schütteln. Er ist ein Meister der Gänsehaut und beweist, dass man auch über Vampire immer noch ein wirkungsvolles Genre-Bonbon drehen kann. Schade, dass der Film dem Publikum manchmal bewährte Genre-Szenen serviert. Mit solchen Szenen hat uns zuletzt – nach einer sehr langen Zeit – Snyders Dawn of the Dead Freude gemacht (das verwandelte Mädchen oder die identische Szene mit der notwendigen Beseitigung des angesteckten Kumpels). Es ist auch ein bisschen schade, dass die Vampire aus der "Hauptgruppe" nicht individueller dargestellt wurden – so, wie es Guillermo del Toro machen würde. Ansonsten ist der Film toll. (26.11.2007)

I liked Hard Candy, but 30 Days of Night almost took my breath away. Why almost? Because the ending was not very believable and the last scene doesn’t fit the film at all. But I have no complaints about the first half: perfect atmosphere, terrifying vampires, effective jump-scares, sharp axe… One of the best horror films of the year and a well deserved 85%. (24.12.2007)

Winter and snow favor the freezing atmosphere, a severed city at the literal end of the world offers some surprises, but when it comes to the creatures of the night, the percentage of interest begins to dangerously decrease. Vampires are not vampires, but a pack of hungry zombies, clichés with suddenly agitated survivors get on your nerves and even uncompromising bloodthirstiness eventually becomes almost annoying. The weak third star is saved for the town of Barrow by a likable central duo and a surprisingly stylish ending. 50% (23.10.2010)

David Slade high-fives Sam Raimi, takes a compelling comic book premise, makes us forget about his tragic first film, and serves up arguably the most impressive "A" horror hit of the season. After the ridiculous attempts over the last few years, when vampires were put into latex, etc., predators finally appear on the screen, finally giving us sheer terror. The work with the initial tension and the subsequent massacre is a perfect example of how to effectively build up not only the scene but the film as a whole. The two-hour runtime perhaps deserved more careful script treatment (the occasional lapse in logic or plot deafness), but the unpleasant chills make up for it. Josh Hartnett has finally become a man, the citizens of the backwoods throw out a sharp catchphrase here and there, and the ride with the milling machine is now part of the golden fund. And although horror history won't be radically rewritten via this film, a good few lines of it are sure to be memorable. If only for the fact that most of the people sitting in the movie theater only started eating their popcorn as they were leaving. (07.11.2007)

It was the tenth of January, just about the time most folks are learning to live comfortably with all the New Year's resolutions they broke, and there was one hell of a northeaster blowing outside. Six inches had come down before dark and it had been going hard and heavy since then... Thus begins King's phenomenal vampire story One for the Road. And why am I quoting it? Because it fully captures the atmosphere that abounds in Thirty Days of Night. In the first few shots. Slade made it quite raw and atmospheric. Moreover, the Saw-like cheapness in terms of the violence depicted is simple and all the more impressive because of it. It looks good and the whole introduction until the city is taken over (the bird's eye view scenes - you will understand when you see it) is absolutely perfect. But after that, the creators are no longer able to resist the shortcomings that stem from the mediocre comic book source, which managed to attract attention perhaps only because of its unconventional imagery. These are mainly plot faux-pas: excessive abbreviation, inconsistency of fragmented narration, and utter ignorance of the psychological impact of the situation on individual characters. The closer the movie draws to the end, the lower down the ladder the quality becomes. The only thing keeping it within the bounds of a decent film, are Josh Harnett and Slade's efforts to embellish it with some juicy scenes here and there. Overall, it is undoubtedly a solid achievement, which benefits quite a bit from the fact that we haven’t seen anything this in a long time. As much as Thirty looks alright, and is enjoyable in its own way, it cannot escape the stigma of simplicity and the dull mediocrity of the comic book despite all its efforts... (01.11.2007)